[PATCH] D137181: [clang-format] Don't use 'PPIndentWidth' inside multi-line macros
Noah Goldstein via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 2 12:24:55 PDT 2022
goldstein.w.n added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5024
style);
+
verifyFormat("#if 1\n"
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Don't add an empty line here.
Will drop for V2.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5045
+
+ style.ColumnLimit = 40;
+ style.IndentPPDirectives = FormatStyle::PPDIS_None;
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Do you need it?
No, copied along when I was looking for examples of unit-tests with trailing '\'. I'll drop for V2
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5047
+ style.IndentPPDirectives = FormatStyle::PPDIS_None;
+ verifyFormat("#ifdef foo\n"
+ "#define bar() \\\n"
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Do you need to enclose the macro definition in `#ifdef`/`#endif`?
No, but figured since this change is related to PP indentation the tests should have it. You would prefer I make the test just:
```
verifyFormat("#define bar() \\\n"
" if (A) { \\\n"
" B(); \\\n"
" } \\\n"
" C();\n",
"#define bar() if (A) { B(); } C();\n",
style);
```
?
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5054-5056
+ "#ifdef foo\n"
+ "#define bar() if (A) { B(); } C();\n"
+ "#endif",
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> You can delete them.
Them being the ifdef/endif? If so will do for V2.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5066-5068
+ "#ifdef foo\n"
+ "#define bar() if (A) { B(); } C();\n"
+ "#endif",
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Delete them or change to multiline format like lines 5048-5052.
Delete the test of the ifndef/endif? Can do either for V2.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:5078-5080
+ "#ifdef foo\n"
+ "#define bar() if (A) { B(); } C();\n"
+ "#endif",
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Same here.
Same question as above, otherwise will do for V2.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list