[PATCH] D137082: [clang][Interp] Fix dereferencing arrays with no offset applied

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

aaron.ballman added a comment.

> There is a difference between a Pointer and a "Pointer to the first element of an array".

I'm pretty confused because this statement is false per the language standard (http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.sub#2). Basically, array subscripting works through pointer arithmetic, so `&array[0]` and `array` (decayed to a pointer) have the same value. Why do we need to offset to get to the first element in the interpreter?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137082/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137082