[PATCH] D136293: [IncludeCleaner] Add public API
Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 24 03:24:32 PDT 2022
kadircet marked 13 inline comments as done.
kadircet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/include/clang-include-cleaner/Analysis.h:14
+#include "llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h"
+#include <variant>
+
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> This is awful but: as mentioned on another patch, we can't actually use variant. AFAIK all C++17 *language* features are available, but LLVM supports apple clang 9.3, which doesn't provide <variant> at all.
>
> There's an IntrusiveVariant in review somewhere but seems stalled (and honestly the Intrusive part makes it pretty ugly to use).
>
> I think for now our best option is a Kind enum and some kind of uintptr_t storage :-(
right, i've seen that comment as well and wanted to pile up there. there are already uses of `<variant>` in LLVM today, TableGen, DenseMap, CodeGen, flang, pseudo, MLIR and lldb are some examples of big components. I don't see what they're doing to compile those today.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp:125
+TEST(WalkUsed, Basic) {
+ llvm::Annotations HeaderCode(R"cpp(
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> signal-to-noise in this test is a bit low, and there'll be a bunch more tests as the features get extended.
>
> I think adding a `TEST_F` fixture and splitting the stdlib out into its own test, trying to maximize the shared code, may lead to cleaner tests.
>
> Feel free to defer this, just watch out for incremental inertia giving you a 1000 line monster before you know it!
yup, that's definitely something i've in pending patches.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136293/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136293
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list