[PATCH] D136013: [clang][Interp] Fix ignoring expression return values

Timm Bäder via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 18 23:47:35 PDT 2022


tbaeder added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp:208
+
+struct S {
+  int a = 0;
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Hmmm, this feels related to the discarded value results changes, but it might be a test case for a different scenario as well, so take this or leave it:
> ```
> struct S {
>   int &Ref;
>   constexpr S(int &R) : Ref(R) { Ref = 0; }
>   constexpr ~S() { Ref = 12; }
> };
> 
> constexpr S get_s(int &i) { return S{i}; }
> 
> constexpr int func() {
>   int i = 1;
>   {
>     get_s(i);
>   }
>   return i;
> }
> 
> static_assert(func() == 12);
> ```
> The idea behind the test is -- we construct the `S` object but discard its results in the compound block, but the dtor still runs as expected.
I think this would trigger the TODO I added, since this is a RVO function but we have nowhere to write the return value.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D136013/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D136013



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list