[PATCH] D136084: Fix LIT CodeGen/Func-attr.c
Erich Keane via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 17 09:28:55 PDT 2022
erichkeane added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/func-attr.c:1
-// RUN: %clang -c -ffast-math -emit-llvm -S -o - %s \
-// RUN: | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang -c -O2 -target x86_64 -ffast-math\
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -S -o - %s | FileCheck %s
----------------
zahiraam wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > It isn't really appropriate to add an opt-level to the test, and it doesn't really depend on it. I don't really understand @saugustine 's request in the other thread: MOST of the clang-codegen tests aren't supposed to have opt-levels added to them, and will fail because of it.
> >
> > So I'm unshocked that adding '-O2' to a test would cause it to fail. Clang tests are generally NOT supposed to be run with an opt-setting.
> I did notice that the there is some extra information generated before the attribute at the function define when Ox (x>0) is used.
I don't believe that is unexpected. The wildcard there is likely fine (though you might want to remove a space either before or after it in case that is not generated), or add --disable-llvm-passes to this if the original patch would only really 'work' at certain opt-levels, but having it run opt is going to cause problems downstream, and makes these tests very sensitive to what the middle/backends do.
But running opt on a CodeGen test isn't really appropriate.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136084/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136084
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list