[PATCH] D134311: [clang] handle extended integer constant expressions in _Static_assert (PR #57687)
Martin Sebor via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 28 12:28:23 PDT 2022
This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rGa181de452df3: [clang] handle extended integer constant expressions in _Static_assert (PR… (authored by msebor).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134311?vs=463607&id=463648#toc
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134311/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134311
Files:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
clang/test/Sema/static-assert.c
Index: clang/test/Sema/static-assert.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Sema/static-assert.c
+++ clang/test/Sema/static-assert.c
@@ -74,3 +74,23 @@
_Static_assert(1 , "") // expected-error {{expected ';' after '_Static_assert'}} \
// ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+
+static int static_var;
+_Static_assert(&static_var != 0, ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}} \
+ // expected-warning {{comparison of address of 'static_var' not equal to a null pointer is always true}}
+_Static_assert("" != 0, ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+_Static_assert(("" != 0), ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+_Static_assert(*"1", ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+_Static_assert("1"[0], ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+_Static_assert(1.0 != 0, ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+_Static_assert(__builtin_strlen("1"), ""); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+// ext-warning at -9 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// ext-warning at -8 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// ext-warning at -8 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// ext-warning at -8 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// ext-warning at -8 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// ext-warning at -8 {{expression is not an integer constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+// __builtin_strlen(literal) is considered an integer constant expression
+// and doesn't cause a pedantic warning
+#endif
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -16736,10 +16736,21 @@
AssertExpr = FullAssertExpr.get();
llvm::APSInt Cond;
+ Expr *BaseExpr = AssertExpr;
+ AllowFoldKind FoldKind = NoFold;
+
+ if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+ // In C mode only allow folding and strip the implicit conversion
+ // to the type of the first _Static_assert argument that would
+ // otherwise suppress diagnostics for arguments that convert to int.
+ FoldKind = AllowFold;
+ BaseExpr = BaseExpr->IgnoreImpCasts();
+ }
+
if (!Failed && VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(
- AssertExpr, &Cond,
- diag::err_static_assert_expression_is_not_constant)
- .isInvalid())
+ BaseExpr, &Cond,
+ diag::err_static_assert_expression_is_not_constant,
+ FoldKind).isInvalid())
Failed = true;
if (!Failed && !Cond) {
Index: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
===================================================================
--- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
Bug Fixes
---------
+- Correct ``_Static_assert`` to accept the same set of extended integer
+ constant expressions as is accpted in other contexts that accept them.
+ This fixes `Issue 57687 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57687>`_.
- Fixes an accepts-invalid bug in C when using a ``_Noreturn`` function
specifier on something other than a function declaration. This fixes
`Issue 56800 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56800>`_.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D134311.463648.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3817 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20220928/4990d81f/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list