[PATCH] D134067: [HLSL] Enable availability attribute
Chris Bieneman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 16 13:25:15 PDT 2022
beanz added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaHLSL/AvailabilityMarkup.hlsl:15
+void fn() {
+ // expected-warning at +2 {{'fn6_0' is only available on HLSL ShaderModel 6.0 or newer}}
+ // expected-note at +1 {{enclose 'fn6_0' in a __builtin_available check to silence this warning}}
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> So minor thing, and one that I am going to start pushing for more, is better organization of 'expected-diagnostics'. I think they should better reflect the order and 'cause' of the diagnostic, particularly with notes. So something like:
>
> ```
> // expected-warning at +3 {{... only available ...}}
> // expected-note@#FN60_LOC {{ marked as being introduced...}}
> // expected-note at +1{{enclose...}}
> ```
>
> Then on line 5, add the comment: `// FN60`
>
> I have this preference because it makes it more clear to the reader where the notes come from. I realize this is a new direction, and perhaps pushing my ability to request, but I'd still appreciate it happening here (I WILL be pushing for it on template reviews, where I think it is even MORE beneficial, thanks to 'instantiation of' diagnostics, and I have the authority to demand it :) ).
I was completely unaware of the ability to create labels like that. That's awesome. I'll update the tests.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134067/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134067
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list