[PATCH] D133194: rewording note note_constexpr_invalid_cast

[Muhammad Usman Shahid via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Codesbyusman marked an inline comment as done.
Codesbyusman added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp:3
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11_20,cxx20_2b -triple x86_64-linux -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-pointer-arith -Wno-zero-length-array -Wno-c99-designator -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic %s -Wno-comment -Wno-tautological-pointer-compare -Wno-bool-conversion
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11_20,cxx11    -triple x86_64-linux -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-pointer-arith -Wno-zero-length-array -Wno-c99-designator -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic %s -Wno-comment -Wno-tautological-pointer-compare -Wno-bool-conversion
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11_20,cxx11    -triple x86_64-linux -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-pointer-arith -Wno-zero-length-array -Wno-c99-designator -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic %s -Wno-comment -Wno-tautological-pointer-compare -Wno-bool-conversion -Wvla 
+
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > We don't need to use `-Wvla` to see the diagnostic change, and this will fix the test failures from the other RUN lines not generating the same warning about use of a VLA.
> And this is a better suggestion here.
Sorry I forget to mention removing here in cpp case -Wvla was working so go with vla or without it?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133194/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133194