[clang] abd2b1a - [clang] Fix a crash in constant evaluation

Kadir Cetinkaya via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 8 09:31:22 PDT 2022


Author: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: 2022-09-08T18:21:44+02:00
New Revision: abd2b1a9d0421f99d3d132dc99af55ae52f3ac3e

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abd2b1a9d0421f99d3d132dc99af55ae52f3ac3e
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abd2b1a9d0421f99d3d132dc99af55ae52f3ac3e.diff

LOG: [clang] Fix a crash in constant evaluation

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
    clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-value-init.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index ba5690cd3c5a0..a5568e0158e33 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -4844,6 +4844,8 @@ enum EvalStmtResult {
 }
 
 static bool EvaluateVarDecl(EvalInfo &Info, const VarDecl *VD) {
+  if (VD->isInvalidDecl())
+    return false;
   // We don't need to evaluate the initializer for a static local.
   if (!VD->hasLocalStorage())
     return true;

diff  --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-value-init.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-value-init.cpp
index 0d9ca8c55cd56..3314174a0ea17 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-value-init.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-value-init.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++17 -fsyntax-only -verify
 
 struct A {
   constexpr A() : a(b + 1), b(a + 1) {} // expected-note 5{{outside its lifetime}}
@@ -46,3 +46,17 @@ static_assert(e2.a[0].a == 1, "");
 static_assert(e2.a[0].b == 2, "");
 static_assert(e2.a[1].a == 1, "");
 static_assert(e2.a[1].b == 2, "");
+
+namespace InvalidDeclInsideConstExpr {
+template <int a> struct i; // expected-note {{template is declared here}}
+template <> struct i<0> {};
+
+template <int x> constexpr auto c() {
+  // i<x> is valid, but it might be incomplete. g would be invalid in that case.
+  i<x> g; // expected-error {{implicit instantiation of undefined template 'InvalidDeclInsideConstExpr::i<1>'}}
+  return 0;
+}
+
+auto y = c<1>(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of function template specialization 'InvalidDeclInsideConstExpr::c<1>' requested here}}
+auto x = c<0>(); // this is valid.
+}


        


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list