[PATCH] D132952: [Sema] disable -Wvla for function array parameters

YingChi Long via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Sep 4 20:36:20 PDT 2022


inclyc added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/warn-vla.c:8-12
+void test2(int n, int v[n]) { // c99 no-warning
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901L
+// expected-warning at -2{{variable length arrays are a C99 feature}}
+#endif
 }
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> The diagnostic there is rather unfortunate because we're not using a variable-length array in this case.
Emm, I'm not clear about whether we should consider this a VLA, and generates `-Wvla-extensions`. Is `v[n]` literally a variable-length array? (in source code) So it seems to me that we should still report c89 incompatibility warnings?



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D132952/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D132952



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list