[PATCH] D133043: [clangd] Fix tests for implicit C function declaration
Aleksandr Platonov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 31 12:23:44 PDT 2022
ArcsinX created this revision.
ArcsinX added reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, kadircet.
Herald added a subscriber: arphaman.
Herald added a project: All.
ArcsinX requested review of this revision.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, MaskRay, ilya-biryukov.
Herald added a project: clang-tools-extra.
clangd code fixes at D122983 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983> were not right.
We need to check that clangd provides IncludeFixer fixits for implicit function declaration even if this is not an error (e.g. implicit function declaration in C89).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133043
Files:
clang-tools-extra/clangd/ParsedAST.cpp
clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/DiagnosticsTests.cpp
Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/DiagnosticsTests.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/DiagnosticsTests.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/DiagnosticsTests.cpp
@@ -1465,11 +1465,12 @@
TEST(IncludeFixerTest, HeaderNamedInDiag) {
Annotations Test(R"cpp(
$insert[[]]int main() {
- [[printf]](""); // error-ok
+ [[printf]]("");
}
)cpp");
auto TU = TestTU::withCode(Test.code());
- TU.ExtraArgs = {"-xc"};
+ TU.ExtraArgs = {"-xc", "-std=c99",
+ "-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration"};
auto Index = buildIndexWithSymbol({});
TU.ExternalIndex = Index.get();
@@ -1482,13 +1483,22 @@
"declarations"),
withFix(Fix(Test.range("insert"), "#include <stdio.h>\n",
"Include <stdio.h> for symbol printf")))));
+
+ TU.ExtraArgs = {"-xc", "-std=c89"};
+ EXPECT_THAT(
+ *TU.build().getDiagnostics(),
+ ElementsAre(AllOf(
+ Diag(Test.range(), "implicitly declaring library function 'printf' "
+ "with type 'int (const char *, ...)'"),
+ withFix(Fix(Test.range("insert"), "#include <stdio.h>\n",
+ "Include <stdio.h> for symbol printf")))));
}
TEST(IncludeFixerTest, CImplicitFunctionDecl) {
- Annotations Test("void x() { [[foo]](); /* error-ok */ }");
+ Annotations Test("void x() { [[foo]](); }");
auto TU = TestTU::withCode(Test.code());
TU.Filename = "test.c";
- TU.ExtraArgs.push_back("-std=c99");
+ TU.ExtraArgs = {"-std=c99", "-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration"};
Symbol Sym = func("foo");
Sym.Flags |= Symbol::IndexedForCodeCompletion;
@@ -1509,6 +1519,13 @@
"support implicit function declarations"),
withFix(Fix(Range{}, "#include \"foo.h\"\n",
"Include \"foo.h\" for symbol foo")))));
+
+ TU.ExtraArgs = {"-std=c89", "-Wall"};
+ EXPECT_THAT(*TU.build().getDiagnostics(),
+ ElementsAre(AllOf(
+ Diag(Test.range(), "implicit declaration of function 'foo'"),
+ withFix(Fix(Range{}, "#include \"foo.h\"\n",
+ "Include \"foo.h\" for symbol foo")))));
}
TEST(DiagsInHeaders, DiagInsideHeader) {
Index: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ParsedAST.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clangd/ParsedAST.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clangd/ParsedAST.cpp
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@
// We restore the original severity in the level adjuster.
// FIXME: It would be better to have a real API for this, but what?
for (auto ID : {diag::ext_implicit_function_decl_c99,
+ diag::ext_implicit_lib_function_decl,
diag::ext_implicit_lib_function_decl_c99,
diag::warn_implicit_function_decl}) {
OverriddenSeverity.try_emplace(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D133043.457058.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2973 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20220831/c84a8269/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list