[PATCH] D130894: [clang] Print more information about failed static assertions
Martin Storsjö via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 11 04:56:15 PDT 2022
mstorsjo added a comment.
In D130894#3715709 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894#3715709>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D130894#3715143 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894#3715143>, @xbolva00 wrote:
>
>> In D130894#3715124 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894#3715124>, @mstorsjo wrote:
>>
>>> This broke building with GCC (also noted by buildbot mails):
>>>
>>> ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp: In member function ‘void clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const clang::Expr*)’:
>>> ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:16666:19: error: declaration of ‘const clang::Expr* clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const clang::Expr*)::<unnamed struct>::Expr’ changes meaning of ‘Expr’ [-fpermissive]
>>> 16666 | const Expr *Expr;
>>> | ^~~~
>>> In file included from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:22,
>>> from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/ASTLambda.h:18,
>>> from ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:15:
>>> ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:109:7: note: ‘Expr’ declared here as ‘class clang::Expr’
>>> 109 | class Expr : public ValueStmt {
>>> | ^~~~
>>
>> It is kinda bad that GCC throws an error and Clang does not even print a warning.
>>
>> How is it even possible? Clang does not implement strict(er) rules ? @aaron.ballman
>
> I pushed up a change to "fix" this
FWIW, the same issue actually already was fixed by ebe0674acb8bb3404d0e2a6b689d5e3cd02bb0b6 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGebe0674acb8bb3404d0e2a6b689d5e3cd02bb0b6> - although your commit made it even clearer.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list