[PATCH] D129640: [clang][ASTImporter] Improved handling of functions with auto return type.

[Balázs Kéri via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

balazske added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3269-3273
+    // Note: It is possible that T can be get as both a RecordType and a
+    // TemplateSpecializationType.
+  }
+  if (const auto *TST = T->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>()) {
+    return llvm::count_if(TST->template_arguments(), CheckTemplateArgument);
----------------
martong wrote:
> Is it possible that `T` is both a `RecordType` and a `TemplateSpecializationType` at the same time? From the [[ https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1TemplateSpecializationType.html | hierarchy ]] this seems impossible (?)
The type dump shows that a `RecordType` is contained within the `TemplateSpecializationType` and it looks like that the get function handles this case. When the `else` is added the check of `TemplateSpecializationType` is skipped and the template argument expression `X` is not found (only integer constant `1`).
```
TemplateSpecializationType 0x23fd8c0 'Tmpl<X>' sugar Tmpl
|-TemplateArgument expr
| `-ConstantExpr 0x23fd798 'int'
|   |-value: Int 1
|   `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x23fd780 'int' <LValueToRValue>
|     `-DeclRefExpr 0x23fd760 'const int' lvalue Var 0x23fd648 'X' 'const int' non_odr_use_constant
`-RecordType 0x23fd8a0 'struct Tmpl<1>'
  `-ClassTemplateSpecialization 0x23fd7b8 'Tmpl'
```


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D129640/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D129640