[PATCH] D126694: [C++20][Modules] Implementation of GMF decl elision.

Iain Sandoe via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 8 00:51:43 PDT 2022


iains added a comment.

In D126694#3637690 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694#3637690>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:

> In D126694#3635207 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694#3635207>, @iains wrote:
>
>> @rsmith, @ChuanqiXu apologies for the multiple revisions, this has turned out to be much more involved than I imagined from the standard's text.
>>
>> In D126694#3629254 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694#3629254>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
>>
>>> In D126694#3629251 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694#3629251>, @iains wrote:
>>>
>>>> In D126694#3629094 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694#3629094>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTW, after I applied the patch, the compiler crashes at https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9/stdmodules.
>>>>
>>>> That link points to a project - is there (say) a gist of the crash information?
>>>
>>> Here is the crash log:
>>
>> this code now compiles without error,
>
> Thanks for looking into it!
>
> My personal plan for this revision is to review the details after we add more large tests (at least we have a more complete std modules implementation and I am trying for it. But I find another bug now). So we might need to wait for a while for this patch. How do you think about it?

Well, the difficulty there is that "add more large tests" is not a very specific objective.
I will be first to say that we can tell that the implementation here is necessary, but we cannot tell if it is sufficient - however, IMO we need to find a more definite way to make progress.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126694



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list