[libunwind] 43c84e4 - [libunwind, EHABI, ARM] Fix get/set of RA_AUTH_CODE.

Simon Tatham via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 27 01:36:44 PDT 2022


Author: Simon Tatham
Date: 2022-06-27T09:36:21+01:00
New Revision: 43c84e463426ca35fe9fc2d38063d75fed944f23

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43c84e463426ca35fe9fc2d38063d75fed944f23
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43c84e463426ca35fe9fc2d38063d75fed944f23.diff

LOG: [libunwind,EHABI,ARM] Fix get/set of RA_AUTH_CODE.

According to EHABI32 ยง8.5.2, the PAC for the return address of a
function described in an exception table is supposed to be addressed
in the _Unwind_VRS_{Get,Set} API by setting regclass=_UVRSC_PSEUDO and
regno=0. (The space of 'regno' values is independent for each
regclass, and for _UVRSC_PSEUDO, there is only one valid regno so far.)

That is indeed what libunwind's _Unwind_VRS_{Get,Set} functions expect
to receive. But at two call sites, the wrong values are passed in:
regno is being set to UNW_ARM_RA_AUTH_CODE (0x8F) instead of 0, and in
one case, regclass is _UVRSC_CORE instead of _UVRSC_PSEUDO.

As a result, those calls to _Unwind_VRS_{Get,Set} return
_UVRSR_FAILED, which their callers ignore. So if you compile in the
AUTG instruction that actually validates the PAC, it will try to
validate what's effectively an uninitialised register as an
authentication code, and trigger a CPU fault even on correct exception
unwinding.

Reviewed By: danielkiss

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128522

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp b/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp
index 6ac09adfb8fe..f203887567b6 100644
--- a/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp
+++ b/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp
@@ -432,8 +432,7 @@ _Unwind_VRS_Interpret(_Unwind_Context *context, const uint32_t *data,
       uint32_t sp;
       uint32_t pac;
       _Unwind_VRS_Get(context, _UVRSC_CORE, UNW_ARM_SP, _UVRSD_UINT32, &sp);
-      _Unwind_VRS_Get(context, _UVRSC_PSEUDO, UNW_ARM_RA_AUTH_CODE,
-                      _UVRSD_UINT32, &pac);
+      _Unwind_VRS_Get(context, _UVRSC_PSEUDO, 0, _UVRSD_UINT32, &pac);
       __asm__ __volatile__("autg %0, %1, %2" : : "r"(pac), "r"(lr), "r"(sp) :);
     }
 #else
@@ -1138,8 +1137,7 @@ _Unwind_VRS_Pop(_Unwind_Context *context, _Unwind_VRS_RegClass regclass,
       }
       uint32_t pac = *sp++;
       _Unwind_VRS_Set(context, _UVRSC_CORE, UNW_ARM_SP, _UVRSD_UINT32, &sp);
-      return _Unwind_VRS_Set(context, _UVRSC_CORE, UNW_ARM_RA_AUTH_CODE,
-                             _UVRSD_UINT32, &pac);
+      return _Unwind_VRS_Set(context, _UVRSC_PSEUDO, 0, _UVRSD_UINT32, &pac);
     }
   }
   _LIBUNWIND_ABORT("unsupported register class");


        


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list