[PATCH] D128499: [Clang] Fix: Restore warning inadvertently removed by D126061.
Martin Böhme via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 24 05:21:52 PDT 2022
mboehme marked an inline comment as done.
mboehme added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:4633-4637
Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier AS, DeclSpec &DS,
RecordDecl *&AnonRecord) {
- return ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(S, AS, DS, MultiTemplateParamsArg(), false,
+ return ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(S, AS, DS, ParsedAttributesView::none(),
+ MultiTemplateParamsArg(), false,
AnonRecord);
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> It's surprising that we don't need to update this interface as well; is that inconsistency desired?
This is OK because every caller of this overload happens to do `ProhibitAttributes(DeclAttrs)`.
But now that you bring this up, I realize that this is risky. What if we add another caller in the future that doesn’t do `ProhibitAttribubtes(DeclAttrs)`? And even in the current situation, I think it makes sense to be explicit that we’re passing an empty list of attributes.
So I’ve added the `DeclAttrs` parameter to this function too, and now pass `ParsedAttributesView::none()` at the callsites.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list