[PATCH] D128402: [clang-tidy] Don't treat invalid branches as identical

[Ishaan Gandhi via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ishaangandhi added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:236
 
+- Fixed a false positive in :doc:`bugprone-branch-clone
+  <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-branch-clone>` when the branches
----------------
Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> ishaangandhi wrote:
> > Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > > ishaangandhi wrote:
> > > > Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > > > > Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > > > > > ishaangandhi wrote:
> > > > > > > ishaangandhi wrote:
> > > > > > > > Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Documentation path was changed recently. Please also keep alphabetical order inside section.
> > > > > > > > Hm? Its still at this path on mastesr: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
> > > > > > > Also, it doesn't look alphabetized to me? Two points up is "performance-unnecessary-..." then its "bugprone-use-after...".
> > > > > > Sorry, my mistake.
> > > > > It'll be good idea to fix order of other entries too.
> > > > Happy to! Would you like that in this diff or a new one?
> > > This is trivial change and could be made in same commit.
> > Done
> Sorry for being unclear, but I meant alphabetical order for check names, not beginning of sentences.
This is then unclear to me. How do you alphabetize by check name?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D128402/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D128402