[PATCH] D127357: [pseudo] wip/prototype: use LR0 instead of SLR1 table

[Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

sammccall added a comment.

My current thinking is this is too much overhead to accept.

I'm going to try to take some of these ideas and apply them to our SLR(1) implementation, in particular store heads as nodes rather than pending actions.
I think it's worth accepting some slowdown for this, which the fast-path might pay for.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D127357/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127357