[PATCH] D113545: [C++20] [Module] Support reachable definition initially/partially
Chuanqi Xu via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 7 01:16:07 PDT 2022
ChuanqiXu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp:1947
+ // DeclModule if it isn't (transitively) imported.
+ if (DeclModule->getTopLevelModule()->isModuleInterfaceUnit())
+ return true;
----------------
iains wrote:
> ChuanqiXu wrote:
> > iains wrote:
> > > I think isModuleInterfaceUnit needs to include implementation partition units, since they also have a BMI (is `isInterfaceOrPartition()` the right thing to use here?
> > I think we couldn't use `isInterfaceOrPartition()` here. The call for `isModuleInterfaceUnit()` here is sufficient. For example, we could find the example at [[ https://eel.is/c++draft/module.reach#example-1 | [module.reach]example 1 ]], here in Translation unit #5:, the definition of struct B is not reachable since the definition lives in an implementation unit. (We could make it valid by making all additional TU as reachable)
> >
> > Also the module interface unit shouldn't include implementation partition unit according to the wording: [[ https://eel.is/c++draft/module.unit#2 | [module.unit]p2 ]]. I agree that it is confusing since implementation partition unit is importable. But this is not our fault.
>
> OK, perhaps I am missing something - just to clarify,...
>
> In this (which I believe is legal like [module.unit] ex 1 TU 4.
> ```
> module;
> ....
> module Main;
>
> import :ImplUnit; // this has a BMI which could contain reachable definitions, right?
>
> ...
> ```
>
>
>
>
Yeah, I believe this is legal according to [module.reach]p1:
> A translation unit U is necessarily reachable from a point P if U is a module interface unit on which the translation unit containing P has an interface dependency, **or the translation unit containing P imports U**, in either case prior to P.
Since module Main imports `:ImplUnit` directly, the `:ImplUnit` TU is necessarily reachable.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113545/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113545
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list