[PATCH] D126891: [clang-tidy] The check should ignore final classes
Carlos Galvez via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 3 01:19:10 PDT 2022
carlosgalvezp added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:170
+ <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines-virtual-class-destructor>` involving
+ `final` classes. The check will not diagnose `final` marked classes, since
+ those cannot be used as base classes, consequently they can not violate the
----------------
I believe the convention is to use double-backtick for C++ keywords and functions, see line 160.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126891/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126891
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list