[PATCH] D126281: [analyzer] Fix symbol simplification assertion failure

Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 24 02:47:09 PDT 2022


martong created this revision.
martong added reviewers: NoQ, steakhal.
Herald added subscribers: manas, ASDenysPetrov, gamesh411, dkrupp, donat.nagy, Szelethus, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, rnkovacs, szepet, baloghadamsoftware, xazax.hun.
Herald added a reviewer: Szelethus.
Herald added a project: All.
martong requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55546

The assertion mentioned in the issue is triggered because an
inconsistency is formed in the Sym->Class and Class->Sym relations. A
simpler but similar inconsistency is demonstrated here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114887 .

Previously in `removeMember`, we didn't remove the old symbol's
Sym->Class relation. Back then, we explained it with the following two
bullet points:

> 1. This way constraints for the old symbol can still be found via it's
>
> equivalence class that it used to be the member of.
>
> 2. Performance and resource reasons. We can spare one removal and thus one
>
> additional tree in the forest of `ClassMap`.

This patch do remove the old symbol's Sym->Class relation in order to
keep the Sym->Class relation consistent with the Class->Sym relations.
Point 2) above has negligible performance impact, empirical measurements
do not show any noticeable difference in the run-time. Point 1) above
seems to be a not well justified statement. This is because we cannot
create a new symbol that would be equal to the old symbol after the
simplification had happened. The reason for this is that the SValBuilder
uses the available constant constraints for each sub-symbol.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126281

Files:
  clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
  clang/test/Analysis/symbol-simplification-assertion.c


Index: clang/test/Analysis/symbol-simplification-assertion.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ clang/test/Analysis/symbol-simplification-assertion.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=true \
+// RUN:   -verify
+
+// Here we test that no assertion is fired during symbol simplification.
+// Related issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55546
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+extern void abort() __attribute__((__noreturn__));
+#define assert(expr) ((expr) ? (void)(0) : abort())
+
+void clang_analyzer_printState();
+void clang_analyzer_dump(long);
+void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
+
+int a, b, c;
+long L, L1;
+void test() {
+  assert(a + L + 1 + b != c);
+  assert(L == a);
+  assert(c == 0);
+  L1 = 0;
+  assert(a + L1 + 1 + b != c);
+  assert(a == 0); // no-assertion
+}
Index: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
+++ clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -2508,12 +2508,6 @@
   SymbolSet ClsMembers = getClassMembers(State);
   assert(ClsMembers.contains(Old));
 
-  // We don't remove `Old`'s Sym->Class relation for two reasons:
-  // 1) This way constraints for the old symbol can still be found via it's
-  // equivalence class that it used to be the member of.
-  // 2) Performance and resource reasons. We can spare one removal and thus one
-  // additional tree in the forest of `ClassMap`.
-
   // Remove `Old`'s Class->Sym relation.
   SymbolSet::Factory &F = getMembersFactory(State);
   ClassMembersTy::Factory &EMFactory = State->get_context<ClassMembers>();
@@ -2527,6 +2521,12 @@
   ClassMembersMap = EMFactory.add(ClassMembersMap, *this, ClsMembers);
   State = State->set<ClassMembers>(ClassMembersMap);
 
+  // Remove `Old`'s Sym->Class relation.
+  ClassMapTy Classes = State->get<ClassMap>();
+  ClassMapTy::Factory &CMF = State->get_context<ClassMap>();
+  Classes = CMF.remove(Classes, Old);
+  State = State->set<ClassMap>(Classes);
+
   return State;
 }
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D126281.431622.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2267 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20220524/4d69b5fa/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list