[PATCH] D123878: [AMDGPU] Add remarks to output some resource usage

Scott Linder via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 13 18:27:14 PDT 2022


scott.linder added a comment.

In D123878#3507378 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123878#3507378>, @vangthao wrote:

> I am not sure if allowing clang to accept newlines is a good idea. It seems like clang wants to know what type of message is being outputted. For example whether this is a remark, warning, etc. but allowing for a diagnostic to output their own newline makes it ambiguous where exactly that output is coming from.

It already supports newlines in any diagnostic which doesn't use the trivial format string `"%0"`, and at least `clang/test/Misc/diag-line-wrapping.cpp` explicitly tests this behavior.

It seems reasonable that clang could add a prefix or indentation scheme while emitting multi-line diagnostics to the terminal, to help with the ambiguity issue. For example instead of the current output:

  clang/test/Misc/diag-line-wrapping.cpp:8:14: error: non-static member 'f' found in multiple base-class subobjects of type 'B':
      struct DD -> struct D1 -> struct B
      struct DD -> struct D2 -> struct B

Maybe we could have something like:

  clang/test/Misc/diag-line-wrapping.cpp:8:14: error: ...
  ...: non-static member 'f' found in multiple base-class subobjects of type 'B':
  ...:     struct DD -> struct D1 -> struct B
  ...:     struct DD -> struct D2 -> struct B

I don't know if changing this kind of output is a breaking change, though? I do know some tooling parses this output.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123878/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123878



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list