[PATCH] D121120: [clang-tidy] New check for safe usage of `std::optional` and like types.

[Yitzhak Mandelbaum via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ymandel marked an inline comment as done.
ymandel added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-unchecked-optional-access.rst:29
+
+Checking if a value exists, then accessing the value
+----------------------------------------------------
----------------
xazax.hun wrote:
> I wonder if it would be easier to read if we had two top level categories, one for safe and one for unsafe accesses instead of switching back and forth between examples.
Sounds good, done. Let me know if that's what you had in mind.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120