[PATCH] D124621: [Analyzer] Fix assumptions about const field with member-initializer
Balázs Benics via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 29 09:25:43 PDT 2022
steakhal accepted this revision.
steakhal added a comment.
In D124621#3482782 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124621#3482782>, @mantognini wrote:
> In D124621#3481973 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124621#3481973>, @steakhal wrote:
>> BTW have you measured the observable impact of this patch on large codebases? Do you have any stats?
> I can't share the data but I can say it fixes some user reports. :-)
For the upcoming patches, it would be nice to test the patches on a small set of open-source projects for exactly this reason.
I think there is a `clang/utils/analyzer/SATest.py` script helping you on this part.
It seems we have quite a few projects on the testset `clang/utils/analyzer/projects/projects.json`.
We are not using it, because we have a different internal testing infrastructure, but it's definitely better than nothing.
> I think @NoQ refers to https://reviews.llvm.org/D45774 but I'll wait for a week or so for confirmation in case there's more to it.
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:1982-1984
// Check if the region has a binding.
if (const Optional<SVal> &V = B.getDirectBinding(R))
@NoQ I was always puzzled why don't we check if we have default bindings after checking direct bindings.
Do you have anything about that?
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the cfe-commits