[PATCH] D122285: [analyzer] Add path note tags to standard library function summaries.

[Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

NoQ marked 5 inline comments as done.
NoQ added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:400
+  ///     then the return value is 0
+  ///     and the note may say "Assuming the character is non-alphabetical".
+  class SummaryCase {
----------------
balazske wrote:
> It would be good to test how this looks in doxygen output. If it is for generated documentation formatting tags can be used, otherwise this can be a `//` comment.
It doesn't! Classes in .cpp files don't seem to show up in doxygen at all. So it doesn't matter which style do we use. I think I'll keep it doxygenized just in case we decide to move these classes out to a public header at some point.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122285/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122285