[PATCH] D124435: [X86] Always extend the integer parameters in callee

[Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

pengfei added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/X86/integer_argument_passing.c:2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O2 -triple -x86_64-linux-gnu %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=EXTEND,CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O2 -triple -i386-linux-gnu %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=EXTEND,CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O2 -triple -i386-pc-win32 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=EXTEND,CHECK
----------------
pengfei wrote:
> LiuChen3 wrote:
> > pengfei wrote:
> > > Maybe we can remove the tests for i386 given it's only for 64 bits ABI?
> > According to the meaning of `ConservativeExtend`, I think the 32bit ABI needs to be modified as well:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/W1Ma1T3f3
> > The dump of currently clang-cl:
> > ```
> > _square:
> >         movb    4(%esp), %al
> >         mulb    %al
> >         mulb    8(%esp)
> >         retl
> > 
> >         .def    _baz;
> >         .scl    2;
> >         .type   32;
> >         .endef
> >         .section        .text,"xr",one_only,_baz
> >         .globl  _baz
> >         .p2align        4, 0x90
> > _baz:
> >         movswl  4(%esp), %eax
> >         pushl   %eax
> >         calll   _bar
> >         addl    $4, %esp
> >         retl
> > ```
> > Of course with this patch the behavior of clang-cl is still different from cl.exe, but I think it fits the meaning of `ConservativeExtend`.
> My point was, i386 is passing arguments by stack. The extensions don't make sense under the circumstances. That's what I understood the comments in above test 2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c
Oh, seems I misunderstood it. The stack still needs extensions since it's aligned to 4 bytes. But from the above output, the clang-cl is wrong, because it extends on caller which MSVC extends on callee. So back the another question, we should change for Windows too, right?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124435/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124435