[PATCH] D123319: Change how we handle auto return types for lambda operator() to be consistent with gcc

Shafik Yaghmour via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 25 22:22:12 PDT 2022

shafik added a comment.

In D123319#3473283 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319#3473283>, @dblaikie wrote:

> ('scuse the delay)
> Baseline: I'm still not really sure this is the right direction. Is there a sound argument for why this change is suitable for lambdas, but not for other types? I believe all the situations that can happen with other types can happen with lambdas (& the other way around) with sufficiently interestingly crafted inputs.

I had a couple of approaches but once I saw how gcc was handling it, I just went with consistency with gcc. I might have been missing some cases but I did not have other test case that I ran into issues with.

  rG LLVM Github Monorepo



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list