[PATCH] D119544: Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation

[Tom Honermann via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

tahonermann added a comment.

> I wouldn't think so either? In this case the problem is that 'u' is not in the re-manufactured scope, I think there is a bit of work to make sure that lambdas ALSO get the scope of their containing function, if they are in a functiondecl.

I wouldn't expect lambdas to require special handling; I think they should be handled via their transformation to a member function of a dependent local class or dependent member class.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544