[PATCH] D123450: [clang-format] Parse Verilog if statements
Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 12 13:00:05 PDT 2022
HazardyKnusperkeks added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:374
+ /// Verilog we want to treat the backtick like a hash.
+ tok::TokenKind AliasToken = tok::unknown;
+
----------------
sstwcw wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > Can't we do that with a type?
> >
> > I'm not very happy about the alias, because you can still call `Tok.getKind()`.
> The main problem I seek to solve with the alias thing is with `tok::hash`. In Verilog they use a backtick instead of a hash. At first I modified all places in the code to recognize the backtick. MyDeveloperDay said "year really not nice.. its like we can never use tok::hash again!" Using a type also requires modifying all instances of tok::hash if I get you right. How do I please everyone?
Then you must hide Tok in the private part, so that no one can ever access `Tok.getKind()` accidentally.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:1533
+ switch (Tok.Tok.getKind()) {
+ case tok::kw_case:
+ case tok::kw_class:
----------------
sstwcw wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > So you have a blacklist what is not a keyword? Seems a bit non future proof, new C++ keywords would have to be added here.
> This is a whitelist of what is a keyword.
My bad. Go on.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123450/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123450
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list