[PATCH] D122524: [Driver][AVR] Emit proper warnings for different options

Ben Shi via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 28 20:01:15 PDT 2022


benshi001 added a comment.

In D122524#3411879 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122524#3411879>, @MaskRay wrote:

> In D122524#3411872 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122524#3411872>, @benshi001 wrote:
>
>> In D122524#3410542 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122524#3410542>, @MaskRay wrote:
>>
>>> I think it is excessive to add so many RUN lines. I do not understand much about AVR -mcpu. That said, I created D122553 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122553> for what I think should be done for the `-c/-S/-fsyntax-only` condition. More tests would just be excessive.
>>>
>>> You may adjust the patch to do the rest cleanups/fixes.
>>
>> I have made some changes based on your https://reviews.llvm.org/D122553, it seems you have reverted. I suggest you recommit, since I have fixed the failures of lacking avr-gcc.
>
> I did not specify --sysroot so the new tests failed on systems without avr-gcc. Relanded.

I have made some changes based on your code:

1. We should always warn if there is no mmcu specified, since its info (instruction set version) is used by the llvm backend.
2. We need no warn no avr-gcc&avr-libc if `-S`/`-c` is specified, since the compiling stage need neither avr-gcc nor avr-libc.

Thanks for your way to avoid checking so many `-c`/`-S`/`-fsyntax-only`/... conditions.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122524/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122524



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list