[PATCH] D111400: [Clang] Implement P2242R3

[Corentin Jabot via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

cor3ntin added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:2132-2136
+    for (Stmt *SubStmt : S->children())
+      if (SubStmt &&
+          !CheckConstexprFunctionStmt(SemaRef, Dcl, SubStmt, ReturnStmts,
+                                      Cxx1yLoc, Cxx2aLoc, Cxx2bLoc, Kind))
         return false;
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> cor3ntin wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > 
> > This is consistent with the same code above. Should I be inconsistent?
> I don't have strong opinions, either way is defensible. I just have a hard time reading the code with nesting the substatements like this.
Would you be happy if i fix all of them later as a nfc?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111400/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111400