[PATCH] D121550: [clang-format] Fix crash on invalid requires expression
Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 13 14:09:51 PDT 2022
HazardyKnusperkeks added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:215
+ assert(CurrentToken->Previous && "Unknown previous token");
+ FormatToken &OpeningParen = *CurrentToken->Previous;
+ assert(OpeningParen.is(tok::l_paren));
----------------
curdeius wrote:
> Maybe you can commit the rename as a NFC commit and rebase the patch to remove the noise?
Done in D121557
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp:335
+
+ // Invalid Code, but we don't want to crash. See http://llvm.org/PR54350.
+ Tokens = annotate("bool r10 = requires (struct new_struct { int x; } s) { "
----------------
curdeius wrote:
> I'd prefer a valid C++ code (if it's not too complicated) if possible but that's acceptable.
I thought I'd stick to the bug report. The only thing that comes to my mind does compile on gcc, but clang gives a specific error (which I support, without having looked into the standard). https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/WvT9861b6
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121550/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121550
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list