[PATCH] D120185: [ASTMatchers] Output currently processing match and nodes on crash
Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 3 14:10:43 PST 2022
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Essentially looks good to me now, thanks!
================
Comment at: clang/lib/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.cpp:789
+ else
+ OS << "<anonymous> ";
+ D->getSourceRange().print(OS,
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Should this be `"<anonymous> : "` instead?
> Good catch
It'd probably be good to add some test coverage for these weird edge cases (unnamed structs, constructors or other special member functions without a name).
================
Comment at: clang/lib/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.cpp:796
+ MV.ActiveASTContext->getSourceManager());
+ } else if (const auto *T = Item.second.get<Type>()) {
+ OS << T->getTypeClassName() << "Type : ";
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > njames93 wrote:
> > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > Do we also need a match for `TypeLoc` matchers, or does the `else` cover that sufficiently well?
> > > >
> > > > (Actually, should we handle all of the various matchers at: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h#L141 rather than leaving it to an `else`? Then the `else` can become an unreachable so we know to update this interface?)
> > > The else should be sufficient for most general cases, the only reason some are special cased is to improve the output, but I don't want there to be a burden to update this interface if new nodes are added.
> > I should verify: does this map hold arbitrary AST nodes, or does the map only hold the top-level classes in the AST matching hierarchy?
> >
> > If it's arbitrary AST nodes, then yeah, I definitely agree the `else` here is fine. If it's top-level classes instead, we don't add those all that often and so it doesn't seem like a major burden to keep those in sync.
> It can hold any kind of node that can be stored in a DynTypedNode, so essentially it's any arbitrary AST node.
Thanks for clarifying that; the `else` look *beautiful* to me! :-D
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120185/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D120185
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list