[PATCH] D116637: [Clang][Sema][OpenMP] Sema support for `atomic compare`

Thu Feb 3 11:14:15 PST 2022

tianshilei1992 added a comment.

In D116637#3294474 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637#3294474>, @ABataev wrote:

> In D116637#3294466 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637#3294466>, @tianshilei1992 wrote:
>
>> In D116637#3294390 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637#3294390>, @ABataev wrote:
>>
>>> In D116637#3294361 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637#3294361>, @tianshilei1992 wrote:
>>>
>>>> @ABataev @jdoerfert I got a question about writing the test. `atomic compare` is supported from 5.1. Basically we have three ways to guard those `atomic compare` code:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Use macro `_OPENMP`. This pretty much works with one exception: we don't set the macro for `-fopenmp-simd`. Then we cannot test `-fopenmp-simd`.
>>>> 2. Use those `omp50-error` and `omp50-note` which are shown in this patch. `-fopenmp-simd` can be tested now. However, it doesn't work with `-emit-pch`. The compiler emits errors that `unexpected OpenMP clause 'compare' in directive '#pragma omp atomic'` for the lower version tests. If we add `-verify` to the `-emit-pch` line, then the pch will not be generated.
>>>> 3. Put `atomic compare` tests in another file.
>>>>
>>>> For now only the 3rd method could work, but I'm not sure if there are ways to work around the limitation in the first two approaches.
>>>
>>> The second or the 3rd approach.
>>> The tests should work with emit pch and include pch options, otherwise precompiled modules are broken. Need to test it too.
>>
>> For the 2nd method, `-verify` doesn't work with `-emit-pch`. Any way to work around it?
>
> Do not use it with emit-pch, just like in the test you modified

Then those tests w/o `-fopenmp-version=51`, `clang` emits error "unexpected OpenMP clause 'compare' in directive '#pragma omp atomic'" and exits w/ error code, and the test fails.

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116637