[PATCH] D118370: [clang-tidy] bugprone-signal-handler: Code refactor (NFC)

[Richard via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

LegalizeAdulthood added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/SignalHandlerCheck.cpp:146
+  if (!HandlerDecl->hasBody()) {
+    checkFunction(HandlerDecl, HandlerExpr);
     return;
----------------
Why do we ignore the return value of `checkFunction` here?

Also, the name doesn't reveal to me why the result is true
or false, e.g. it acts like a predicate but its name doesn't ask
a question.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D118370/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D118370