[PATCH] D116593: Fix `performance-unnecessary-value-param` for template specialization
Felix Berger via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 4 06:44:57 PST 2022
flx added a comment.
Thanks for improving this check!
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/performance/UnnecessaryValueParamCheck.cpp:177-178
const auto &CurrentParam = *FunctionDecl->getParamDecl(Index);
+ if (IsExplicitTemplateSpecialization && Function != FunctionDecl)
+ continue;
Diag << utils::fixit::changeVarDeclToReference(CurrentParam,
----------------
Could you add a comment here why we're skipping the fix here?
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/performance-unnecessary-value-param.cpp:388
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:54: warning: the parameter 'E' is copied
+ // CHECK-FIXES: T templateSpecializationFunction(const ExpensiveToCopyType& E) {
+ return T();
----------------
Should we apply the fixes or just issue the warning? For virtual methods we suppress the fix since we can't necessarily update all overrides of the method. Are template specializations always guaranteed to be in the same translation unit which would make this safe?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116593/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116593
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list