[PATCH] D116478: [clang-tidy] A comma-separated list of the names of functions or methods to be considered as not having side-effects

[Eugene Zelenko via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:141
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+- Added a setting ``bugprone-assert-side-effect.FunctionExceptions`` for
+  a comma-separated list of the names of functions or methods to be considered
----------------
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > Please separate with newline and use single back-ticks for options.
> I introduced those double backticks due to review comments. As it turns out, single backticks are only for links, not for formatted text. Should they be brought back?
Double back-ticks are for language constructs, single back-ticks for options, tool names, etc.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116478/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116478