[PATCH] D116316: [clang-format] Add an experimental option to remove optional control statement braces in LLVM C++ code

Owen Pan via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 28 14:09:47 PST 2021


owenpan added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:3419
+   if (isa<VarDecl>(D)) {              vs.     if (isa<VarDecl>(D)) {
+     for (auto *A : D.attrs()) {                 for (auto *A : D.attrs())
+       if (shouldProcessAttr(A)) {                 if (shouldProcessAttr(A))
----------------
curdeius wrote:
> I'm not sure if the braces on the right should be removed in the for loop.
> There should probably be an option to set the  minimum number of lines/statements inside a control statement to control adding/removing braces.
> I'm not sure if the braces on the right should be removed in the for loop.
This //is// the LLVM [[ https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-braces-on-simple-single-statement-bodies-of-if-else-loop-statements | style ]]. See also line 23086 in FormatTest.cpp below.
> There should probably be an option to set the  minimum number of lines/statements inside a control statement to control adding/removing braces.
If you have more than one statement inside a control statement block, the braces must stay.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116316/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116316



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list