[PATCH] D115738: [clang-format] Fix formatting of the code that follows C# Lambda Expressions
Peter Stys via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 16 03:25:14 PST 2021
peterstys added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestCSharp.cpp:766
+
+ verifyFormat(R"(//
+public class Sample {
----------------
peterstys wrote:
> peterstys wrote:
> > MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > > Nit: (only my preference) but I don't like the use of RawStrings in these tests (I know others have let them creep in) but I find them more unreadable because we lose the indentation.. I think I'm just so used to the other style that this just crates a little.
> > >
> > > Just my personal preference (you can ignore)
> > I used the RawStrings as it was very easy to copy snippet of code to a separate file so I could run clang-format on it to check all was working well. I also copied snippets to my local IDE to check if the file was building, or at least structurally okay (which I appreciate is not a requirements as clang-format does not build a complete AST of the code).
> >
> > For example, I was surprised to see some sample code in unit tests missing braces after catch (Exception) statement (line 694) (which may have been intended). I find it slightly more difficult to read those code snippets if they are decorated with \n.
> >
> > On the other hand, you're right, raw string break the indentation which is not great. Also, I'd rather follow the leading preferences (and wasn't sure which ones where they before your comment). I'm happy to update this to your style if that is the preference.
> I tried to apply your preferred style but after running clang-format on the test file, many files were split which made it look much less readable, in my opinion. Here's an example:
>
> verifyFormat(
> "public class Test\n"
> "{\n"
> " private static void ComplexLambda(BuildReport protoReport)\n"
> " {\n"
> " allSelectedScenes =\n"
> " "
> "veryVeryLongCollectionNameThatPutsTheLineLenghtAboveTheThresholds.Where("
> "scene => scene.enabled)\n"
> " .Select(scene => scene.path)\n"
> " .ToArray();\n"
> " if (allSelectedScenes.Count == 0)\n"
> " {\n"
> " return;\n"
> " }\n"
> " Functions();\n"
> " AreWell();\n"
> " Aligned();\n"
> " AfterLambdaBlock();\n"
> " }\n"
> "}",
> MicrosoftStyle);
>
>
> I think it makes it look cleaner and more readable if we stick to the raw string literals for my tests. WDYT?
by "many files" I meant "many code snippets".
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115738/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115738
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list