[PATCH] D112626: Convert float to double on __builtin_dump_struct
John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 1 18:17:31 PST 2021
rjmccall added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp:2090-2094
+ // Variadic functions expect the caller to promote float to double.
+ if (CanonicalType == Context.FloatTy) {
+ FieldPtr =
+ CGF.Builder.CreateFPExt(FieldPtr, CGF.ConvertType(Context.DoubleTy));
+ }
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> This change is an improvement as far as it goes, but I think we might be missing other floating-point promotions here. For example, `__fp16` fields also seem to be unusable: https://godbolt.org/z/z3a45f9YE
>
> Also, we don't seem to handle the integer promotions at all (but still get correct results there), so I think we're getting the correct behavior there by chance rather than by design. Oh, yeah, note the differences here: https://godbolt.org/z/f13eq3668
>
> ```
> foo:
> ...
> %7 = load i8, i8* %4, align 1, !dbg !217
> %8 = call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([6 x i8], [6 x i8]* @2, i32 0, i32 0), i8 %7), !dbg !217
> ...
>
> bar:
> ...
> %2 = load i8, i8* %1, align 1, !dbg !222
> %3 = zext i8 %2 to i32, !dbg !222
> %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8], [5 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0), i32 %3), !dbg !223
> ...
> ```
> I think we should probably fix all of the promotion problems at once rather than piecemeal.
>
It's actually really annoying that this logic has to be duplicated in IRGen instead of being able to take advantage of the existing promotion logic in Sema. Can we just generate a helper function in Sema and somehow link it to the builtin call?
Um. Also, the `static` local DenseMap in the code above this is totally unacceptable and should not have been committed. Clang is supposed to be embeddable as a library and should not be using global mutable variables.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112626/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112626
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list