[PATCH] D113925: [HIP] Add HIP scope atomic operations

[John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

rjmccall added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:5587
     // the GNU atomics specification, but we enforce it, because if we didn't it
     // would be very confusing. FIXME:  For whom? How so?
     Diag(ExprRange.getBegin(), diag::err_atomic_op_needs_trivial_copy)
----------------
gandhi21299 wrote:
> gandhi21299 wrote:
> > rjmccall wrote:
> > > I'm confused about what's happening here.  You're editing comments to make more tendentious claims, and then adding FIXMEs to make charged questions about your own claims?  Did you consider just not editing the comments?
> > Ahh I totally missed this, my apologies. I will revert this patch and get rid of this comment. Thanks for pointing it out.
> Actually, this comes from a different patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114025#change-dkrDg1ZRTmhm
Ah, Phabricator is just being weird, then; sorry for the noise.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D113925/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D113925