[PATCH] D64454: [clang-tidy] Adding static analyzer check to list of clang-tidy checks
Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 11 05:44:03 PST 2021
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D64454#3122281 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64454#3122281>, @steakhal wrote:
> It seems like the list got pretty outdated by the time.
> Do you think we should really refer to the clang-analyzer checks in this list? What about simply referring to the clangsa docs instead?
> I fear, this will be a constant problem in the future.
Yeah, I was worried this would get out of sycn and it really did not take long for that to happen in practice. I think there's utility in listing the checks in clang-tidy's documentation instead of pointing users to the SA documentation page. Users should have one website to go to where they can see what clang-tidy checks are available to them.
> That being said, a specific grep-like test would suffice to ensure it's always updated, but I would be surprised as a clang static analyzer developer that I need to run the clang-tools-extra tests besides the clang-analysis ones.
> It would cause build bot breakages all the time - and just as many revert commits by choosing that direction.
> WDYT? @aaron.ballman @njames93 @whisperity
So long as pre-commit CI runs the test, I think this might be a reasonable path forward. You may forget to run the tests locally, but you should still get some failure indication before we land a patch. That should also curtail the churn from having to revert. WDYT?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the cfe-commits