[PATCH] D112221: Mark ATOMIC_VAR_INIT and ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT as deprecated

[Arthur O'Dwyer via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Quuxplusone added a comment.

If libc++ is using these macros, then I think it would be useful to include (the removal of) those uses in this PR.

  ../libcxx/include/atomic:#define ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(value) see below
  ../libcxx/include/atomic:#define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT see below
  ../libcxx/include/atomic:#define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT {false}
  ../libcxx/include/atomic:#define ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(__v) {__v}
  ../libcxx/src/barrier.cpp:            __atomic_base<__barrier_phase_t> __phase = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0);
  ../libcxx/src/experimental/memory_resource.cpp:        ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(&res_init.resources.new_delete_res);
  ../libcxx/src/ios.cpp:atomic<int> ios_base::__xindex_ = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0);
  ../libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.flag/init_bool.pass.cpp:std::atomic_flag global = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
  ../libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.flag/init.pass.cpp:// atomic_flag() = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
  ../libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.flag/init.pass.cpp:    std::atomic_flag f = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
  ../libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.types.operations/atomics.types.operations.req/atomic_var_init.pass.cpp:// #define ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(value)
  ../libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.types.operations/atomics.types.operations.req/atomic_var_init.pass.cpp:    std::atomic<int> v = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(5);
  ../libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.types.operations/atomics.types.operations.req/ctor.pass.cpp:      constexpr Atomic a = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(t);
  ../libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/async.pass.cpp:std::atomic_bool invoked = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(false);



================
Comment at: clang/test/Headers/stdatomic-deprecations.c:11
+void func(void) {
+  (void)ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(12); // expected-warning {{macro 'ATOMIC_VAR_INIT' has been marked as deprecated}} \
+                             // expected-note at stdatomic.h:* {{macro marked 'deprecated' here}}
----------------
This doesn't look like correct use of the `ATOMIC_VAR_INIT` macro. It should be initializing an atomic, yeah?
(Note for example that if you did `(void)ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT(12)`, even with libc++'s implementation, it would just fail with a syntax error, because `(void){12}` is not a valid expression AFAIK.)


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112221/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112221