[PATCH] D111830: [clang] fix typo correction not looking for candidates in base classes.

[Matheus Izvekov via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG489561d46381: [clang] fix typo correction not looking for candidates in base classes. (authored by mizvekov).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111830/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111830

Files:
  clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprMember.cpp
  clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp


Index: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp
+++ clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@
 
 namespace dr141 { // dr141: yes
   template<typename T> void f();
-  template<typename T> struct S { int n; };
+  template<typename T> struct S { int n; }; // expected-note {{'::dr141::S<int>::n' declared here}}
   struct A : S<int> {
     template<typename T> void f();
     template<typename T> struct S {};
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
   struct B : S<int> {} b;
   void g() {
     a.f<int>();
-    (void)a.S<int>::n; // expected-error {{no member named 'n'}}
+    (void)a.S<int>::n; // expected-error {{no member named 'n' in 'dr141::A::S<int>'; did you mean '::dr141::S<int>::n'?}}
 #if __cplusplus < 201103L
     // expected-error at -2 {{ambiguous}}
     // expected-note at -11 {{lookup from the current scope}}
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprMember.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprMember.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprMember.cpp
@@ -611,11 +611,10 @@
     if (Record->containsDecl(ND))
       return true;
 
-    if (const CXXRecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record)) {
+    if (const auto *RD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record)) {
       // Accept candidates that occur in any of the current class' base classes.
       for (const auto &BS : RD->bases()) {
-        if (const RecordType *BSTy =
-                dyn_cast_or_null<RecordType>(BS.getType().getTypePtrOrNull())) {
+        if (const auto *BSTy = BS.getType()->getAs<RecordType>()) {
           if (BSTy->getDecl()->containsDecl(ND))
             return true;
         }


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D111830.380111.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1695 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20211015/1cba2ea3/attachment.bin>