[PATCH] D108912: [release][analyzer] Add 13.0.0 release notes

Fri Sep 3 05:43:53 PDT 2021

Szelethus added a comment.

In D108912#2972167 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108912#2972167>, @steakhal wrote:

> Maybe a couple other noteworthy commits:
> efa7df1682c2859dabe3646ee7dc01e68629417f <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGefa7df1682c2859dabe3646ee7dc01e68629417f>: better R-value tracking.
> aa454dda2eed4e71081bc57b1f32dfce2486b177 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGaa454dda2eed4e71081bc57b1f32dfce2486b177>: fixing the modeling of `std::bit_cast<>`.

I added a bit more text to the final "various fixes" point, thanks! I didn't dedicate a new point for them though, because although we know how meaningful they are, in the grand scheme of things, I don't think they are as "flashy" from an end user's perspective. Even if they greatly increase confidence in the tool, and are harder to fix then writing a simple checker ;)

> cad9b7f708e2b2d19d7890494980c5e427d6d4ea <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcad9b7f708e2b2d19d7890494980c5e427d6d4ea>: Print time taken to analyze each function

Good idea!

> 9cca5c1391d637b5500ada646cf136ddb38254a3 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG9cca5c1391d637b5500ada646cf136ddb38254a3>: Make checker silencing work for non-pathsensitive bug reports. (It might be valuable to highlight for other vendors.)

We're yet to iron out checker silencing, or finish its discussion before introducing it to the set of function intended for end users. I wouldn't like to advertise it before that happens.

In D108912#2976529 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108912#2976529>, @ASDenysPetrov wrote:

> Here is one more related to HTML diagnostics:
> rG9e02f58780ab8734e5d27a0138bd477d18ae64a1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG9e02f58780ab8734e5d27a0138bd477d18ae64a1> //Highlight arrows for currently selected event//

Good idea!

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D108912/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D108912