[PATCH] D108151: [NFC][clang] Use X86 Features declaration from X86TargetParser
Andrei Elovikov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 19 15:56:56 PDT 2021
a.elovikov marked 3 inline comments as done.
a.elovikov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp:1071
+ assert(llvm::is_contained(Priorities, Priority) &&
+ "Priorites don't form consequtive range!");
+ }
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > craig.topper wrote:
> > > erichkeane wrote:
> > > > If all you care about is whether they are a consecutive range, why not just use `std::is_sorted`?
> > > The Priorities array isn't sorted. It's just whatever order the X86_FEATURE_COMPAT lists them.
> > >
> > > The values need to be unique and in a contiguous range.
> > Then I'd suggest something like: `llvm::sort`, then `assert *(end - 1) - *begin == std::distance(begin, end) && llvm::adjacent_find` or something.
> >
> > I definitely didn't get that point out of this odd for-loop and is_contained. There is perhaps at trick with std::min and std::max too. Though, it looks like this is perhaps trying to prove that the range is 0 to the the array size, right? In that case, perhaps there is something easier.
> >
> > Also a nit, it is `consecutive` in that case.
> Actually...
>
> std::array<unsigned, array_lengthof(Priorities) -1> HelperList;
> std::iota(HelperList.begin(), HelperList.end());
> std::is_permutation(HelperList.begin(), HelperList.end(),
> std::begin(Priorities), std::end(Priorities));
I thought about std::sort + std::iota + std::equal but wasn't sure how readable that would be with the extra helper object (range version isn't available in C++14) and hoped my version would be more compact.
Since it wasn't obvious what it does I shamelessly copied your suggestion (and learnt about std::is_permutation and array_lengthof when doing it).
Thanks!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108151/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108151
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list