[PATCH] D106509: [OpenMP][OpenACC] Implement `hold` map type modifier extension in Clang (1/2)

[Johannes Doerfert via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

jdoerfert added a comment.

> That's fine for me, but don't the routines use llvm_omp_?

That was before we "standardized" `ompx_` for OpenMP 5.2.

> Should we also have that prefix in various enumerators in the implementation? For example, what does OMP_MAP_HOLD become?

I'd suggest `OMPX_MAP_HOLD`


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509