[PATCH] D105756: [clang] C++98 implicit moves are back with a vengeance
Matheus Izvekov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 13 03:40:44 PDT 2021
mizvekov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaObjCXX/block-capture.mm:40
};
-TEST(CopyNoMove); // cxx11_2b-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+TEST(CopyNoMove); // cxx98_2b-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> `cxx98_2b` is just `expected`, isn't it?
Yeah, but in this test we don't have the "expected" expectancy string.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list