[PATCH] D105478: [clang] Make CXXRecrdDecl invalid if it contains any undeduced fields.
Haojian Wu via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 7 00:19:57 PDT 2021
hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-crashes.cpp:117
+ // The missing expression makes A undeduced.
+ static constexpr auto A = ; // expected-error {{expected expression}}
+ Foo<decltype(A)>::type B; // The type of B is also undeduced (wrapped in Elaborated).
----------------
I think the root cause is that this incomplete var declaration is marked valid.
Looks like there are a few inconsistencies in clang:
```
struct Bar {
static constexpr auto A1; // case1: invalid
static constexpr auto A2 = ; // case2: valid
};
// static var decl in global context
static constexpr auto A3; // case3: invalid
static constexpr auto A4 = ; // case4: invalid
```
so it looks like marking case2 valid is a bug, I think we should invalidate it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105478/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105478
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list