[PATCH] D105436: [analyzer][solver] Use all sources of constraints
Valeriy Savchenko via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 6 01:09:31 PDT 2021
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG6017cb31bb35: [analyzer][solver] Use all sources of constraints (authored by vsavchenko).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105436/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105436
Files:
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
clang/test/Analysis/constant-folding.c
Index: clang/test/Analysis/constant-folding.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Analysis/constant-folding.c
+++ clang/test/Analysis/constant-folding.c
@@ -179,6 +179,36 @@
}
}
+unsigned reset();
+
+void testCombinedSources(unsigned a, unsigned b) {
+ if (b >= 10 && (a | b) <= 30) {
+ // Check that we can merge constraints from (a | b), a, and b.
+ // Because of the order of assumptions, we already know that (a | b) is [10, 30].
+ clang_analyzer_eval((a | b) >= 10 && (a | b) <= 30); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ }
+
+ a = reset();
+ b = reset();
+
+ if ((a | b) <= 30 && b >= 10) {
+ // Check that we can merge constraints from (a | b), a, and b.
+ // At this point, we know that (a | b) is [0, 30], but the knowledge
+ // of b >= 10 added later can help us to refine it and change it to [10, 30].
+ clang_analyzer_eval(10 <= (a | b) && (a | b) <= 30); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ }
+
+ a = reset();
+ b = reset();
+
+ unsigned c = (a | b) & (a != b);
+ if (c <= 40 && a == b) {
+ // Even though we have a directo constraint for c [0, 40],
+ // we can get a more precise range by looking at the expression itself.
+ clang_analyzer_eval(c == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ }
+}
+
void testRemainderRules(unsigned int a, unsigned int b, int c, int d) {
// Check that we know that remainder of zero divided by any number is still 0.
clang_analyzer_eval((0 % c) == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
Index: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
+++ clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -884,26 +884,28 @@
}
RangeSet infer(SymbolRef Sym) {
- if (Optional<RangeSet> ConstraintBasedRange = intersect(
- RangeFactory, getConstraint(State, Sym),
- // If Sym is a difference of symbols A - B, then maybe we have range
- // set stored for B - A.
- //
- // If we have range set stored for both A - B and B - A then
- // calculate the effective range set by intersecting the range set
- // for A - B and the negated range set of B - A.
- getRangeForNegatedSub(Sym), getRangeForEqualities(Sym))) {
- return *ConstraintBasedRange;
- }
-
- // If Sym is a comparison expression (except <=>),
- // find any other comparisons with the same operands.
- // See function description.
- if (Optional<RangeSet> CmpRangeSet = getRangeForComparisonSymbol(Sym)) {
- return *CmpRangeSet;
- }
-
- return Visit(Sym);
+ return intersect(
+ RangeFactory,
+ // Of course, we should take the constraint directly associated with
+ // this symbol into consideration.
+ getConstraint(State, Sym),
+ // If Sym is a difference of symbols A - B, then maybe we have range
+ // set stored for B - A.
+ //
+ // If we have range set stored for both A - B and B - A then
+ // calculate the effective range set by intersecting the range set
+ // for A - B and the negated range set of B - A.
+ getRangeForNegatedSub(Sym),
+ // If Sym is (dis)equality, we might have some information on that
+ // in our equality classes data structure.
+ getRangeForEqualities(Sym),
+ // If Sym is a comparison expression (except <=>),
+ // find any other comparisons with the same operands.
+ // See function description.
+ getRangeForComparisonSymbol(Sym),
+ // Apart from the Sym itself, we can infer quite a lot if we look
+ // into subexpressions of Sym.
+ Visit(Sym));
}
RangeSet infer(EquivalenceClass Class) {
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D105436.356628.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3824 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20210706/1b5e0331/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list